Menu

Verbal praise is provided for most routine accomplishments in Drug Courts, including timely attendance at appointments and participation in treatment-related discussions or activities. This is especially important during Phase 1 of the program, when participants have a relatively harder time satisfying basic expectations.  

All team members should be prepared to offer praise at or near the time that accomplishments are achieved; for example, immediately after a productive counseling session or a drug-negative urine test. The judge later reinforces the praise during court hearings.

Participants who have made substantial progress in Drug Court are commonly incentivized by reducing their supervision obligations. For example, they may be permitted to attend less frequent probation appointments or status hearings. Typically, supervision adjustments are made when participants advance to a higher phase in the program. 

Research cautions that Drug Courts should not hold status hearings less frequently than every 4-6 weeks until participants are in the final phase of the program and have initiated their continuing-care plans. Moreover, treatment services should only be reduced based on a clinical determination that it is therapeutically indicated to do so. Finally, drug testing should not be reduced until after other treatment and supervision services have been reduced, and it is reliably determined that drug use has not recurred as a result.

Day trips differ from the social gatherings described earlier, in that they are held off premises.  Typically, they are reserved for participants in the last phase of the program who are being recognized for leaving the “offender” role and assuming a role of “citizen.”

Many participants in Drug Courts are unaccustomed to earning positive reinforcement and respond well to low-magnitude rewards. The rewards are typically given for basic accomplishments during the early phases of the program, such as attending a full week of counseling appointments.  The goal is to instill hope and encourage compliance with the treatment regimen.

The rewards are typically structured so as to increase participants’ involvement in productive activities, and may contain pro-sobriety messages, toll-free phone numbers for local treatment services, or the Drug Court’s logo.

Many Drug Courts impose curfews and area restrictions on participants as a condition of entry into the program. After participants reliably engage in treatment and achieve a sustained period of abstinence, they may be rewarded by reducing those community restrictions. For example, curfews may be extended from 8:00 pm to 10:00 pm. 

In anticipation of commencement from the program, participants’ travel restrictions may be formally lifted, allowing them to leave the county or state for a weekend, extended weekend, or week-long interval.  Typically, phone-ins are required to ensure continued contact with the treatment program or supervision officers.   

Formal recognition is provided in court when participants meet substantial milestones in the program, such as completing a standardized treatment curriculum or achieving 30 consecutive days of sobriety. In addition to verbal praise, participants may receive a handshake from the judge, a round of applause in open court, and/or a certificate of accomplishment.

As noted previously, many Drug Courts reduce supervision requirements — and, unfortunately, sometimes treatment requirements — as an incentive for good behavior. Participants may, for example, be permitted to leave court immediately after their appearances or attend fewer probation appointments. Although this approach can be effective, it risks precipitating relapse if the services are reduced too rapidly.  Moreover, it may reduce opportunities for new participants to interact with their successful peers, because the most successful cases will end up spending the least amount of time on site in the program.  For these reasons, many Drug Courts elevate the status of successful participants in the milieu, and increase their involvement in the program. For example, participants who have achieved stable abstinence, obtained a job, and are actively involved in the 12-Step community, may become peer-support mentors in the Drug Court or may lead discussions in the group counseling sessions. Typically, they do not interact with new participants outside of the program, but rather serve as on-site mentors where there is concurrent professional supervision.   

In the later phases of the program, participants may earn tangible rewards of more substantial value or impact. As is typical, these rewards are used to encourage pro-social and healthy leisure activities, or to assist with adaptive activities of daily living. 

Symbolic rewards may be inexpensive, but they have high emotional impact in the recovery community. Due to their symbolic value, they are generally viewed as being higher in magnitude than the small tangible rewards listed above. Typically, they are delivered to commemorate the achievement of a clinically meaningful milestone, such as 90 consecutive days of abstinence.

As noted earlier, many participants in Drug Courts are unaccustomed to positive reinforcement and respond well to tangible rewards. As participants make positive progress in the program, the magnitude of the rewards progressively increases.  The rewards typically encourage engagement in productive or healthful activities.

Point systems can enable Drug Courts to offer large tangible rewards at a reasonable expense. Rather than earning rewards for each accomplishment, participants earn points or vouchers for satisfying the conditions for phase advancement or other major accomplishments. The points are banked until participants enter the last phase of the program, and they can then trade in the points for a substantial prize. Some programs also offer bonus points for unusual accomplishments, such as receiving a job promotion or earning a GED.]

Evidence of exceptional accomplishments may be openly posted in the Drug Court. For example, pro-sobriety artwork or essays, photographs of participants receiving a diploma or GED, or letters of commendation from employers, may be publicly displayed in the courtroom, treatment program, or probation office.

Many Drug Courts are stretched for resources and may have difficulty offering rewards of more than minor value. The “fishbowl procedure” allows Drug Courts to provide tangible rewards at lesser cost.  

Rather than earning tangible rewards for each accomplishment, participants earn chances to draw paper slips from a fishbowl. The slips award a combination of some tangible prizes and a greater percentage of non-tangible incentives, such as certificates of accomplishment. There may also be 1 or 2 prizes of substantial value ($25 to $50), but the odds of drawing them are small.

Research indicates that the opportunity to earn a substantial reward can be as reinforcing, or more reinforcing, than earning smaller rewards each time. It also adds entertainment value for persons who typically lack pleasurable, pro-social activities in their lives. 

A major advantage of this approach is that participants can earn multiple rewards in the same week (i.e., multiple draws) without incurring undue costs to the program. For example, participants may earn separate draws for attending counseling sessions, delivering drug-negative urine samples, and appearing in court.

Ambassadorships are typically reserved for graduates or individuals making stellar progress in the program. This status enables participants or alumni to represent the Drug Court to outside agencies, such as the public, church groups, legislators, or the media.

Commonly, the participants first take classes or sessions to prepare them for public speaking, and to assist them to tell their stories effectively and in a manner that is comfortable for them.

Written commendations may be shared by participants (assuming they choose to do so) with outside parties, such as employers, family members, or school administrators. They typically inform “to whom it may concern” that the participant has achieved a substantial period of stable sobriety and law-abiding behavior. Because the participant has “turned a corner” and made a significant shift in progress, he or she might be trusted to return to previous activities or roles, assuming that supervision and treatment in the Drug Court will continue.

Self-improvement services differ from the routine interventions provided to all participants. These are personalized services designed to help participants excel in productive lives, and are used to highlight substantial progress participants have made towards assuming pro-social life roles.  The implicit message is that the program is investing in the participant’s future accomplishments. 

Virtually all Drug Courts put great thought and effort into their commencement or graduation ceremonies. 

Participants who have begun to assume appropriate life roles may earn inclusion in social gatherings coordinated by the Drug Court staff. These events are designed to provide healthy recreational experiences and opportunities for participants to practice appropriate social interactions in non-drug-related situations.

Commencement from Drug Court virtually always leads to substantial legal incentives.

Verbal admonishments may be delivered by any staff member and are ideally delivered at or near the time an infraction has occurred; for example, immediately after a missed counseling appointment or drug-positive urine test. The judge later reinforces the admonishment during court hearings.   

Research indicates admonishments should never be delivered in a disrespectful, insulting, or threatening manner. The important points are to: (a) clarify the nature of the infraction, (b) emphasize the expectation of compliance in the program, (c) indicate what sanctions await future transgressions, and (d) consider what alternative actions the participant should take in the future. 

Participants may be required to attend more frequent probation appointments, case management sessions, or status hearings in court. 

They may also be required to undergo more frequent drug testing, or more frequent home or community visits by probation officers or other supervision agents. 

Participants may be required to go to a day-reporting center, correctional halfway center, or probation program on a daily basis for several hours each day, often including weekends. Required activities may include drug testing, counseling sessions, cognitive-behavioral “criminal thinking” interventions, and job training.  The purpose is to substantially restrict and structure participants’ free time.

Participants may be required to write letters of apology to the program or persons they have negatively impacted. They are typically asked to describe their non-compliant or inappropriate behavior, analyze what went wrong, and consider how they will react differently in the future. 

Sometimes, participants are required to read the letter in court or during a counseling session. This decision is based on the severity of the infraction, and whether there are any clinical contraindications to having the participant speak in public or publicly disclose the nature of the event.

For participants who are illiterate or have difficulty writing or staying cognitively focused, tape recordings may be used in lieu of written letters. 

Participants may be required to wear an ankle monitoring device, SCRAM® detection device, or other GPS or phone monitoring device.

Essays are typically longer than letters and may require some degree (typically minor) of independent research.  

Staff members generate a list of topics relevant to recovery, and develop a “lending library” of easy-to-digest pamphlets, fact sheets, audio tapes and books on those topics.

Tape recordings may be used in lieu of writing assignments for participants who are illiterate or have difficulty writing.

Community service keeps participants supervised and away from problematic interactions in their neighborhoods. It may also teach useful or adaptive life skills, provide a sense of accomplishment, and offer an opportunity to make restoration to the community.

The severity of the infraction(s) usually determines the number of hours in a day, and the number of days, the participant must report for community service.

Participants may be required to remain in their homes except for specifically authorized activities, such as work, school, or treatment appointments. Compliance with the curfew is typically enforced via random telephone monitoring calls with voice confirmation, anklet monitors, or random home visits by probation officers.

Participants may be required to carefully plan out in advance the activities they expect to engage in during the coming week.  Then, they use an activity log or spreadsheet to monitor their compliance with, and deviations from, the intended schedule.  This information is reported back to staff and the court, and used to identify problematic times and situations in which drug use or other infractions are likely to occur. Contingency plans are then developed to avoid such problematic situations.  

Activity logs are commonly used for participants who are resistant to thinking in advance about their actions, or who engage in impulsive decision-making.

Monetary fines are often set by law for particular offenses, and in some jurisdictions may not be increased for technical violations or other infractions.

In contrast, fees are typically assessed for services provided to participants or for costs incurred by the program. For example, participants who challenge positive drug tests may be required to pay the costs of retesting if the positive test results are confirmed. Similarly, participants might be charged for missed counseling sessions (although perhaps not for attended sessions if they are on a sliding payment scale). 

It is important not to allow fines or fees to build up beyond participants’ realistic ability to pay. Once the ability to pay has reached a ceiling, the use of non-monetary sanctions is preferable.

Research reveals that “flash” jail sanctions of no more than approximately 3 to 5 days can be effective at reducing noncompliant behavior. If, however, jail sanctions are imposed too frequently, for minor or first-time infractions, or for longer intervals of time, they can quickly become ineffective and cost-prohibitive. 

Commonly, the first (or perhaps second) time a jail sanction is imposed, participants are permitted to serve the sanction at a relatively convenient time, such as over a weekend, during consecutive weekends, or after arrangements for childcare or other obligations have been made. The purpose is to avoid interfering with productive and pro-social obligations. After repetitive infractions, however, participants might be taken directly into custody without an opportunity to prepare.

Journaling focuses on more than events or schedules. Participants also monitor and document their thoughts, feelings and attitudes through descriptive writing assignments.  This information is used to identify emotional triggers for drug use and topics for discussion in counseling.  

Journals are often used for participants who are non-insightful, and who tend to act out before they think about their motivations for doing so.

Participants may be escorted by the bailiff or sheriff’s deputy to a holding cell adjacent to the courtroom or elsewhere in the courthouse. The participant may be held in the cell for the remainder of the court session and then brought back for an appearance at the end of the day. The purpose is to give the individual a “taste” of detention without incurring the costs of transportation or having the individual processed into the jail.

The ultimate sanction in Drug Court ensues from an unsuccessful termination. Participants may receive a criminal record of a conviction, with attendant collateral consequences such as ineligibility for certain public benefits. Participants may subsequently be sentenced on the original charge(s), have their probation or parole revoked, or receive a jail or prison disposition. 

Depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the waivers that are executed to enter the program, participants may, or may not, receive credit for time served in the Drug Court. They also may, or may not, receive an augmented sentence or disposition as a result of their failure to comply with the Drug Court requirements.

Participants may be required to investigate how to accomplish a specific task of daily living. They may need to gather relevant information from staff members, other participants, family members and friends; engage in preparatory actions; develop a plan of action; receive feedback on their plan of action; execute the plan; and take corrective steps, where needed.   

The task is logically linked to areas of difficulty in the participant’s adaptive functioning.

Many Drug Courts require noncompliant participants to sit in the jury box or other designated area of the courtroom to observe the Drug Court proceedings for a day, several days, or a week. This is frequently used to keep participants away from problematic interactions in their neighborhoods. It is also used for participants who tend to be untruthful in their interactions with staff, because they can see how manipulative behaviors appear to observers.

For more serious or repetitive infractions, participants may be required to observe non-drug court proceedings, such as bail hearings or criminal trials. The purpose here is to witness what happens to individuals who do not succeed in Drug Court or who are processed through traditional criminal justice channels. 

The Drug Court may impose additional curfews, area restrictions, association restrictions, or restricted driving privileges. For example, participants may be forbidden from associating with particular individuals, going to particular neighborhoods, being out of their homes after 8:00 pm, or driving their car for purposes other than for work or school. 

Unless curfews are phone-monitored, and unless probation officers, community corrections officers or the police monitor participants’ obedience to other restrictions, they may be expected to have little effect.

Team round-tables are typically used for participants who are in danger of failing out of the Drug Court due to noncompliance with basic expectations, such as failing to show up for counseling sessions or being untruthful. 

The entire Drug Court team meets with the participant to offer feedback and direction from multiple sources in a cohesive and unified way. This is often effective in reducing splitting and triangulation of staff by manipulative individuals.